"Tim Peters" <tim.one@comcast.net> writes: > The evidence suggests there are still potentially catastrophic bugs > in bsddb3! So far, I have interpreted all failures in test_bsddb3 as being related to the explicit use of transactions. Since the historic bsddb module does not provide an interface for transactions, I have always concluded that existing code won't be affected by these problems. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4