[Guido van Rossum]
> What's still missing is a way to add formal parameters to the thunk --
> I presume that J and K are evaluated before interface.interface is
> called. The thunk syntax could be extended to allow this; maybe this
> can too. E.g.:
>
> e:(x, y):
> S
>
Would something along the lines of::
foo = e(x,y)::
S
Work? The double colons (assuming the parser can handle this; don't see
why not but I am knowledge of parsers amounts to squat) would allow for an
obvious differentiation between a pseudo inline block that is being used
in an assignment statement and where a single colon is normally used.
And since there is no keyword here specifically delineating that it is a
define or something it kind of lets it look like a call on e which is sort
of what it is doing. A stretch, I know, but hey, every bit helps. =)
-Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4