> On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Raymond Hettinger wrote: > > Python code has a number of cases where a higher > > level routine traps an exception and reraises it with > > new information and losing the lower level error > > detail in the process. > > How about just holding on to the original exception and > storing it as an attribute (e.g. "cause") on the new exception? > > > -- ?!ng I was just thinking in terms of the error message, but your way is cleaner and more comprehensive. Raymond Hettinger
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4