> I'm willing to keep these things if you fix the documentation. The > documentation for the whole module is currently in a rather sorry > state. Example: "Using the package doesn't get much simpler." is more > sales talk than documentation, and the example following that phrase > produces less and different output than quoted. Yes, but I've already uploaded a better LaTeX documentation file: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=638299&group_id=5470&atid=30 5470 This was uploaded quite a while ago - on 14 November 2002. The version in CVS appears to be a version Skip put together from the web page (http://www.red-dove.com/python_logging.html); hence the "sales talk". The above item is assigned to Skip and you've asked him to merge my upload with his work, or override as he sees fit. The status is still open so I'm not sure whether Skip has had a chance to do anything. Admittedly, that upload does not have complete details on the configuration file format. I can easily rectify this, but can you (or someone) please look at the above upload and tell me if the documentation is otherwise OK? Regards, Vinay
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4