John Williams wrote: > Compared to the other proposal going around (which I'll call Guido's, > since he brought it up), For the record, it was mine. And, in response to another thread: yes, the choice that "def foo() [a,b,c]:" should do a, then b, then c, was deliberate. "Define foo, make it a, make it b, and make it c". :-) (I take no credit for the implementation; that was Michael's alone.) -- Gareth McCaughan
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4