Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> writes:
> A while ago there was a proposal floating around to add an optional
> part to function/method definitions, that would replace the current
> clumsy classmethod etc. notation, and could be used for other purposes
> too. I think the final proposal looked like this:
>
> def name(arg, ...) [expr, ...]:
> ...body...
That was the one I came up with.
> Does anyone remember or know where to find the thread where this
> proposal was discussed? It ought to be turned into a PEP.
I think it was here on python-dev. I was going to turn it into a PEP,
but thought I'd wait until 2.3 was done.
<googles>
Discussion here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-February/020005.html
The patch linked to in that mail still applies, remarkably enough; I
haven't tested whether it *works* recently...
Cheers,
M.
--
Now this is what I don't get. Nobody said absolutely anything
bad about anything. Yet it is always possible to just pull
random flames out of ones ass.
-- http://www.advogato.org/person/vicious/diary.html?start=60
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4