On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:03 pm, Kevin Altis wrote: > Anyway, I'm probably a month away from being able to present an adequate > comparison of using each for different relational datasets. One data set > I'm looking at is roughly 800MB of data, the other is only about 256KB and > I'm looking at the smaller one first since it also has a simpler table > structure. Oh, and one other thing: from way back at the start of this discussion, it was decided that performance was not going to be a major deciding factor. Sure, we can make sure the perfomance doesn't suck, but if you want a large database, use a real database engine :) Richard
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4