Tim Peters <tim.one@comcast.net> writes: > It may depend on what you really meant <wink>. If you're talking about > creating recursive tuples via mutation in C, where tuples are the only > container type involved, then 2.2.2 and 2.1.3 are broken now (they may blow > the stack while comparing such beasts). That's what I thought Barry meant, and if so I really don't think we care. It's not like we can prevent all misbehaving third party C code from segfaulting... Cheers, M. -- It could be argued that since Suitespot is infinitely terrible, that anything else, by very definition of being anything else, is infinitely superior. -- ".", alt.sysadmin.recovery
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4