Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
>
> Vinay Sajip writes:
> > +1 on the name change, but it will break a fair amount of code out there
> > (from the emails I've been receiving). Could we leave warn and WARN in as
> > synonyms for now, but only mention warning and WARNING in the documentation?
>
> I think this would be very reasonable; we don't want to break things
> for people that have been using this package already.
But isn't this a case where the number of people who *will* use
it in the future exceeds the current number of users by a factor
of 10 or 100? Is it really worth the possible confusion?
Introducing a new module with already "deprecated" method names
seems strange to me.
holger
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4