[Brett Cannon, on folding strptime into datetime] > Well, I would assume the responsibility of maintaining it would fall on > my shoulders. But leaving it out is fine with me. I also maintain a pure-Python version of datetime.py (for Zope's use). date/time modules are a bottomless pit. > ... > Also, is there any desire for the C wrapper The C wrapper for what? > to do any checking of the values so we can change the docs and > guarantee that any value returned by ``time.strptime()`` will have > valid values? I think we should lose the C version of strptime and use _strptime.py everywhere now -- allowing x-platform accidents to sneak thru is un-Pythonic (unless they're *valuable* x-platform accidents <wink> -- strptime accidents are random crap).
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4