"Kevin Altis" <altis@semi-retired.com> writes:
> > I know, that's much less fun and no quick satisfaction, but it leads
> > to code *improvement* rather than bitrot.
>
> Yes, but it also means the folks doing the real work in a module are going
> to have to deal with this kind of stuff that probably seems trivial to them
> and not worth doing when they could be writing real code. It just means
> there is more on their plate and that Python itself, may not meet its own
> guidelines; these kinds of changes tend to not get done because there is
> never enough time.
I think this is a bogus argument, sorry. If you're doing something
non trivial to a module, the time required to use string methods
rather than the string module is in the noise.
CHeers,
M.
--
Need to Know is usually an interesting UK digest of things that
happened last week or might happen next week. [...] This week,
nothing happened, and we don't care.
-- NTK Know, 2000-12-29, http://www.ntk.net/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4