"Dan Sugalski" <dan@sidhe.org> > At 1:54 PM -0500 2/27/03, Damien Morton wrote: > >In general, it would seem that adding opcodes in bulk, even if many opcodes > >switch to the same labels, results in a minor performance loss. > > While I'm somewhat loathe to help you guys go faster (that whole pie > thing) you might want to take a look at commonly used pairs of > opcodes and reordering the code in the switch body so pairs are > adjacent and more likely to be in cache. I caught the whole pie conversation, but I missed how you were going to test Parrot against Python. How exactly will this competion be measured?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4