> The relevant data for me was that 1/4, 1/2 of the total posts were = made by just > a small "vocal" group of people Please don't think I missed the importance of this fact. The details of the count were unimportant compared to what this says about how the perceived level of vigorous argument may actually be an artifact of a few outliers. I actually only posted thinking that there might be a bug in your counting algorithm... I still believe that in the end Guido will wind up finding a way to extract a reasonable decision from this mess, although I have a hard time seeing how he'll manage that! Knowing that a few individuals account for a lot of the "noise" may help him. -- Michael Chermside
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4