On Fri, Feb 07, 2003, Guido van Rossum wrote: > Aahz: >> >> I'm mildly concerned about giving extension opcodes specifically to >> "Zope 3". Is there some reason we shouldn't just make that "Zope"? > > I doubt that Zope 2 will ever be using pickle protocol 2. > > Anyway, the class names are all different, so Zope 2 and Zope 3 would > require different extension ranges. Actually, I was thinking more about Zope 4. ;-) My point was that for all the interaction between Python and Zope, they're separate software products, and I don't think the PSF should get involved in Zope version numbers. Just give the range to Zope and let them decide how to use it. This IMO sets a good precedent when it comes time to hand out ranges to other companies. -- Aahz (aahz@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ Register for PyCon now! http://www.python.org/pycon/reg.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4