On Friday, Feb 7, 2003, at 13:36 Europe/Amsterdam, Guido van Rossum wrote: >> So, crazy idea for the morning. Split that sentence up: have one >> list (probably the existing python-dev) where the future of the >> language is discussed. Have another (python-implementors) where >> anything that does not have a short-to-medium term effect on the >> code in Python CVS is strictly forbidden. Can this be made to work? >> Or maybe the last month or so has been the exception and this list >> will just naturally reqcquire some of it's focus. > > *If* we were to split this up, I'd rather create a new list for wild > and crazy ideas. But I'm -0 on splitting -- it wouldn't help *me* > because I'd want to be on both lists anyway, and I'm not sure how many > others are helped by it either -- I imagine that most people would > want to be on both lists. I'm +1 on the two lists, even though I would be on both lists too. However, if the load on python-implementors went down I would actually be able to always read that first thing in the morning (afternoon/evening/night:-), so I wouldn't miss any important messages on 2.3aX distribution building started, or sourceforge downtime, or known problems in the test suite, while I would read python-dev later. -- Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4