> [Paul Moore] > > ... > > The fact that [None] compares less than every other value is to me > > incidental, and arbitrary. > > Arbitrary?! I clearly recall when the decision was made that None would > compare less than anything else. I was in the same room with Guido, and > this is a verbatim transcript of the debate: <snip> > Two lines of code later, the Only Objectively Correct result was achieved. > > history-is-more-impressive-in-textbooks-ly y'rs - tim > How about "everything" or "all" as the obverse of "none", ordered higher than all other values? "Some" is far too indeterminate. Dave LeBlanc Seattle, WA USA
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4