On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 16:59, Guido van Rossum wrote: > Good, this is the kind of module that would make the Python standard > library more useful. However, I've seen many implementations of this > before. Before yours gets accepted into the standard library, you > have to convince us that your version is "best of breed". That's been > done before: the logging package and the optparse module came about > this way. But you have to do the research to compare your version > with others. I recommend that you take this to c.l.py first. On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 16:57, Aahz wrote: > How does this differ from http://pexpect.sourceforge.net/ I knew you would ask that. I did look at those others, and compared them. But ultimately I wrote my own from scratch. Of course, I like mine a lot better... I will provide more details later, as it would require quite a treatise on that subject. -- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keith Dart <mailto:kdart at kdart.com> <http://www.kdart.com/> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Public key ID: B08B9D2C Public key: <http://www.kdart.com/~kdart/public.key> ============================================================================ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20031211/7929b774/attachment.bin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4