Alex Martelli <aleaxit at yahoo.com> writes: > Since these functions or types are going to be in operator, I think > we can afford to "spend" two names to distinguish functionality > (even though attgetter and itemgetter look nowhere as neat as > extract -- I don't have better suggestions offhand). operator.getattr and operator.getitem? Paul. -- This signature intentionally left blank
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4