> > My additions support a subset of C++ virtual methods. > > How is that esoteric? > > Why would an extension writer ever want to do this? "Normal" extension > types either wrap some C type, so you don't have inheritance at all, > or some C++ type, in which case a single type method can wrap > arbitrary virtual methods (since the VMT is done in C++). I'm still in favor of a 'clean' method to add additional C accessible structure fields to types. Currently I'm attaching them to the the type's dict, as I reported before. As I understand it, Christian's first patch allows this. Thomas
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4