Christian Tismer <tismer@tismer.com> writes: > > Christian's additions (as far as I understand them :-) are mostly > > intended for very esoteric situations. > > My additions support a subset of C++ virtual methods. > How is that esoteric? Why would an extension writer ever want to do this? "Normal" extension types either wrap some C type, so you don't have inheritance at all, or some C++ type, in which case a single type method can wrap arbitrary virtual methods (since the VMT is done in C++). A real-world example would help. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4