[Guido van Rossum] > > > [...] It's also kind of hard to read. [...] > > > > True. But not so difficult to improve. Adding a bit of simplicity yields: > > > > | 84 > > 80 | [] > > | [] > > | [] > > | 71 [] > > | [] 63 [] > > 60 | [] [] [] > > | [] [] [] > > | [] [] [] > > | [] [] [] 47 > > | [] 42 [] [] [] > > 40 | [] [] [] [] 39 [] 41 > > | [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 36 > > | [] [] [] [] 30 [] [] 33 [] [] > > | [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 27 [] [] [] > > | [] 25 [] [] [] [] 21 [] [] [] [] [] [] > > 20 | [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] > > | [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] > > | [] [] 12 [] [] [] [] [] [] 9 [] [] [] [] [] > > | [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 5 > > | [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] > > 0 +---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat > > 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 > > Ooh, much better. Still, put this at the end instead of at the top of > the message. It's not *that* interesting. > How about I just get rid of it? It is only in there because Michael had it in his summaries. Actually, the entire header (from the first line to first summary) is there just because Michael had it there. I personally am happy keeping the header as it is sans this count; I know I had to read a lot of emails but I don't think anyone else cares. =) -Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4