[Michael Hudson] > "Steve Holden" <sholden@holdenweb.com> writes: > > > > A bunch of 0.5% improvements add up. If there's not much cost in > > > complexity, why not go for it? > > > > > > > Yeah, right, we just need 200 of them and we're laughing. Computation in > > infinitesimal time. > > Multiply up doesn't have the same ring to it, does it? > Indeed not. I try to keep my pedantry in control, but it escapes from time to time. regards ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Steve Holden http://www.holdenweb.com/ Python Web Programming pydish.holdenweb.com/pwp/ Previous .sig file retired to www.homeforoldsigs.com -----------------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4