> def sequpdate(self, iterable, value=True):
> for elem in iterable:
> self[elem] = value
> return self
I'm strongly against the "return self" part. All your examples use
x = {}.sequpdate(...)
which suggests that you're really looking for a different constructor
as a class method.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4