Tim Peters <tim.one@comcast.net> writes: > Probably can't be, but this is ideal for a conditional-move instruction, and > more architectures are growing that. In the meantime, Martin made this > change, and I haven't measured a slowdown on my box (it is an extra > test-&-branch under MSVC, but the branch is over just one instruction so > doesn't (I believe) flush the pipeline). BTW, you managed to trick me into writing malloc((n) || 1). That took some time to figure out... Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4