A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/030115.html below:

[Python-Dev] Adopting Optik

[Python-Dev] Adopting Optik [Python-Dev] Adopting OptikGuido van Rossum guido@python.org
Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:34:13 -0500
[PF]
> I beg to differ.  In 
>      http://mail.python.org/pipermail/getopt-sig/2002-May/000204.html
> Greg wrote:
>     '''I strongly prefer OptionParser, because that's the main class; it's the
>        one that's always used (ie. directly instantiated).  There are always
>        instances of Option, OptionValues, and the various exception classes
>        floating around -- but most Optik applications don't have to import
>        those names directly.'''

Too bad.  Greg also said he preferred short lowercase module names.

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4