[Gustavo Niemeyer] > Patch #549037 implements an interesting feature: it allows one to have > configuration files without headers. I'd like to know what's your > opinion about this issue, so that we can either forget the issue or > implement the functionality, closing that bug. > I vote for only doing it if the patch does not complicate the code. Adding one '[section]' header is not that painful. But perhaps this conversation should continue on SF? -Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4