> I'm starting to think that it might help overcome that=20 > confusion if "global" gave warnings when used in = probably-inappropriate ways:=20 > not inside a function, or about a variable that the function does not, = in=20 > fact, bind nor re-bind. Is there agreement that this might be = helpful? That sounds helpful to me. Essentially you're declaring that it's an error (well... warning) to use the global statement in a context where it can perform no possible function. And given the name, it's an easy mistake for newbies to make... assuming that all "global variables" need the "global" statement. -- Michael Chermside
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4