Tim> .... What kind of table would you make up? If I remember the discussion correctly, there's not really much (if any) performance benefit to using the macro versions. Since the the macro and function versions of each "function" seem to be paired in your tables, why not simply define the macros to map to the functions for backward compatibility and deprecate the macros altogether? That would have the added benefit of reducing your second table by nearly half again. Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4