Jeremy Hylton wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:11:26 -0500 > Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> wrote: > > > pychecker2 is a complete rewrite using the stdlib > > compiler > > > package. There are only about 10 warnings generated so > > far. > > > One of the goals is to support Jython. Although, > > > we have only used CPython so far. > > > > Hm, but doesn't the compiler package use the parser > > module? Does > > Jython support the parser module? I'd be very surprised, > > since it > > uses different parsing technology... > > The stdlib compiler package relies on the builtin parser > module. It converts the concrete syntax returned by the > parser module to an AST. It should be possible to write a > similar transformer for jython that converts from its > internal parser representation to the same AST. > > On the other hand, I plan to work on a new AST for the > compiler builtin to the interpreter. I expect it will be > quite similar to the compiler package's AST, but perhaps not > exactly the same. It might be better if CPython and Jython > standardized an AST as part of the 2.3 development cycle. > Then pychecker2 could use it. I think this is a great idea! Let me know if I can help. Neal
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4