Tim Peters wrote:
> [Christian]
>
>>I have a one single opinion in this case:
>>Let things be as easy to remember as possible.
>>I'd do exactly what Perl does in this case, whatever
>>it is. Only one fact to learn.
>>
>
> In the face of ambiguity, we're refusing the temptation to guess.
>
> If we have to guess, then being consistent with Python's re is the only
> defensible behavior for Python.
Guess what? If I'm using this lame Perl argument, then just
since it happens to be exactly what I like the best :-)
BTW., to my perception, re was designed to implement the
functionality of Perl's regular expressions. If this is
correct, then it would be consistent to treat things the
same, and re should change this minor spot.
print join ':', split //, 'hi there';
produces 'h:i: :t:h:e:r:e'
--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer@tismer.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Kaunstr. 26 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14163 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
PGP Fingerprint E182 71C7 1A9D 66E9 9D15 D3CC D4D7 93E2 1FAE F6DF
where do you want to jump today? http://www.stackless.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4