[Samuele Pedroni] > Btw given that probably operator.truth() will > become a synonym of bool() the "# or" comment > does not apply. I don't see anything about changing operator.truth() in Guido's PEP, and would be surprised if I did: it's been the documented purpose of that function to return 0 or 1 since 1996, and there's no apparent reason to change it. If you want a similar function to return True or False instead, well, that's what the new bool() would do, and TOOWTDI. > Tim, should we start to be worried about the problems you have to get > those things right or are you just in very-low-concetration mode? I'm in no-concentration mode, and, yes, you should pray for me before going to sleep, upon waking, before meals, and once for each tooth that gets brushed. I'll let you know whether it helps! Thanks in advance.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4