A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-March/020852.html below:

[Python-Dev] Two developer candidates

[Python-Dev] Two developer candidates [Python-Dev] Two developer candidatesGuido van Rossum guido@python.org
Sat, 09 Mar 2002 21:54:07 -0500
[MvL]
> I think *anybody* should submit patches to SF first unless you are
> 100% sure that the patch fixes the problem in an undebatable way, and
> perhaps unless it is you.
> 
> Being able to say "this is fine, please check it in (replacing the C++
> style comment with a C style comment)" already helps reducing the load
> on the reviewer.
> 
> Unless the new contributors are very careful, I'm sure they will break
> the CVS sooner or later. Unless this happens a week before the 2.3
> release, I have no problem with that.

I think I see consensus to give the new folks checkin permission right
away, but encourage them to submit their code to the SF patch manager
first until they've got the hang of it.

Skip, can you tell them this?

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4