A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-March/020803.html below:

[Python-Dev] For review: PEP 285: Adding a bool type

[Python-Dev] For review: PEP 285: Adding a bool type [Python-Dev] For review: PEP 285: Adding a bool typeGuido van Rossum guido@python.org
Fri, 08 Mar 2002 15:41:33 -0500
> I'm kinda curious.  I understand all the arguments, but they've been
> around for a long time.  It's not like any of the reasons for having
> a boolean are new.  What straw broke your pet camel's back and made
> you sit down and say to yourself, "We need a boolean type in Python.
> I think I'll write a PEP today instead of going to Starbucks for a
> latte."?

Well, the subclassing from int solution is new in 2.2.  Other than
that, I was thinking of something non-controversial to be added to
2.3.  Big mistake... :-)

Time for my latte.

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4