Raymond Hettinger wrote: > The idea was to make a = [expr(i) for i in seqn]; print i behave ... No problem. As long as it was decided that there's a use for the current behavior, I won't question it. -Jerry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4