Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: > > > Let's presume a "sub" method with the features of Ping's string > > interpolation PEP. This would look like: > > That's not the PEP being discussed, and if it was, it can't replace > the % mapping. Read the Security Issues. That's true. I didn't mean to endorse any particular solution but rather to clarify the problem. I believe that only one of your examples required a feature (runtime provision of the format string) that was not in Ping's PEP. If another PEP is a better solution to the problem than the current one then fine. My point is that there *is* a problem! Paul Prescod
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4