Greg Ward wrote: > >... > > Yeah, me too. But there are an unbounded number of possible options > that people might insist on, and making these options instance > attributes seems vaguely friendly to subclasses to me. I don't follow. If I want a subclass then I need to instantiate it somehow. When I do, I'll call its constructor. I'll pass its constructor the keyword arguments that the subclass expects. Paul Prescod
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4