> Originally we thought it was more important to > be able to contact the author, but there are quite a few reasons to > revise this intention. As pointed out, email addresses change. Also, > experience has shown that most of the discussions about PEPs are > conducted on the public forums (mailing lists / newsgroups), so that's > a fine way to contact the people working on the PEP. And of course, > we allow the PEP authors to obfuscate or omit their email addresses > altogether. Why not have *two* fields in the PEP, one for the real name, and the other for an email address? Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4