Sorry, I just wasn't looking. Yes, that's probably the right explanation. Thanks, Dave From: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin@v.loewis.de> > "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams@rcn.com> writes: > > > > > I'm surprised it wasn't a > > > > worse problem with MSVC6, because after all, it doesn't even supply a > > type > > > > called "long long". > > > > > > Could that have resulted from defining BOOST_MSVC? > > > > Sorry, I don't understand the question. Could *what* have resulted from > > defining BOOST_MSVC? > > That it (the Python long long configuration) wasn't a worse problem > with MSVC6, even though it doesn't even supply a type called "long > long". > > Regards, > Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4