> Would it be useful to add to the interator "interface" a method which > would retrieve the original iterable object? I've no idea what that > method should be called, but it seems like it would be trivial to add > since most (all?) iterators have a pointer to their underlying object > anyway, don't they? No. The (important!) class of generator-iterators does not have an underlying container object. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4