"Fred L. Drake, Jr." <fdrake@acm.org> writes:
> I've noticed some strangeness with the release22-maint branch. I made
> a documentation change there this morning, and CVS gave the change a
> really weird version number when I checked it in. Looking further, it
> looks like the previous checkin for that file (Doc/tut/tut.tex) has
> some strangeness as well. The branching tags are also pretty
> whacked. This is an excerpt of the "cvs log" for the file:
Looks to me like the release22 tag for Doc/tut/tut.tex was set on the
release22-branch, not the trunk.
This is not what happened for, e.g. configure.in.
Quite how this happened, or what (if anything) we should do about it,
is another question entirely.
cvs status -v is quite handy here.
$ cvs status -v Doc/tut/tut.tex | head -n 20
===================================================================
File: tut.tex Status: Needs Patch
Working revision: 1.157
Repository revision: 1.158 /cvsroot/python/python/dist/src/Doc/tut/tut.tex,v
Sticky Tag: (none)
Sticky Date: (none)
Sticky Options: (none)
Existing Tags:
r212 (revision: 1.133.2.5)
r212c1 (revision: 1.133.2.5)
release22-mac (revision: 1.156.4.1)
release22-maint (branch: 1.156.4.1.2)
release22 (revision: 1.156.4.1)
release22-branch (branch: 1.156.4)
release22-fork (revision: 1.156)
r22c1-mac (revision: 1.156)
r22c1 (revision: 1.156)
r22rc1-branch (branch: 1.156.2)
$ cvs status -v configure.in | head -n 20
===================================================================
File: configure.in Status: Up-to-date
Working revision: 1.289
Repository revision: 1.289 /cvsroot/python/python/dist/src/configure.in,v
Sticky Tag: (none)
Sticky Date: (none)
Sticky Options: (none)
Existing Tags:
r212 (revision: 1.215.2.7)
r212c1 (revision: 1.215.2.7)
release22-mac (revision: 1.288)
release22-maint (branch: 1.288.6)
release22 (revision: 1.288)
release22-branch (branch: 1.288.4)
release22-fork (revision: 1.288)
r22c1-mac (revision: 1.288)
r22c1 (revision: 1.288)
r22rc1-branch (branch: 1.288.2)
Did different people create the release22 tags in different bits of the tree?
Cheers,
M.
--
The "of course, while I have no problem with this at all, it's
surely too much for a lesser being" flavor of argument always
rings hollow to me. -- Tim Peters, 29 Apr 1998
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4