Steven Majewski wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Jason Orendorff wrote: > > Would someone please explain to me what is seen as a "possible > > security issue" in PEP 215? Can anyone propose some real-life > > situation where PEP 215 causes a vulnerability, and the > > corresponding % syntax doesn't? > > Do you mean the current '%' or my expanded example ? I mean the current %. Well? ## Jason Orendorff http://www.jorendorff.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4