A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-August/028480.html below:

[Python-Dev] tiny optimization in ceval mainloop

[Python-Dev] tiny optimization in ceval mainloop [Python-Dev] tiny optimization in ceval mainloopJeremy Hylton jeremy@alum.mit.edu
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 11:50:52 -0400 
>>>>> "SH" == Steve Holden <sholden@holdenweb.com> writes:

  >> Jeremy Hylton <jeremy@alum.mit.edu> writes:
  >>
  >> > The difference I saw with only the ticker check in ceval was
  >> > only about 1% for pystone.  Python was always faster with the
  >> > change, but never by much.
  >>
  >> A bunch of 0.5% improvements add up.  If there's not much cost in
  >> complexity, why not go for it?
  >>

  SH> Yeah, right, we just need 200 of them and we're
  SH> laughing. Computation in infinitesimal time.

I think Xeno's laughing already.

Jeremy

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4