> Jeremy Hylton <jeremy@alum.mit.edu> writes: > > > The difference I saw with only the ticker check in ceval was only > > about 1% for pystone. Python was always faster with the change, but > > never by much. > > A bunch of 0.5% improvements add up. If there's not much cost in > complexity, why not go for it? > Yeah, right, we just need 200 of them and we're laughing. Computation in infinitesimal time. suddenly-dwim-mode-is-possib-ly y'rs - steve ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Steve Holden http://www.holdenweb.com/ Python Web Programming pydish.holdenweb.com/pwp/ Previous .sig file retired to www.homeforoldsigs.com -----------------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4