Jeremy Hylton <jeremy@alum.mit.edu> writes: > The difference I saw with only the ticker check in ceval was only > about 1% for pystone. Python was always faster with the change, but > never by much. A bunch of 0.5% improvements add up. If there's not much cost in complexity, why not go for it? Cheers, M. -- 6. Symmetry is a complexity-reducing concept (co-routines include subroutines); seek it everywhere. -- Alan Perlis, http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/perlis-alan/quotes.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4