Magnus Lie Hetland <magnus@hetland.org>: > By naming the new set module sets and the class Set the parallel to > array module is broken. I guess that's not a problem -- I just thought > I'd mention it. Naming the module "set" would be more analogous to > "array", and having "set" as an alias for "Set" would let people > switch to a possible future type with the same name by commenting out > their import statements... Hmmm...I think I agree with this objection, and I have another. It's not consistently so, but usually the classes that are simpler and closer to the system core aren't capitalized. The name "Set" has a misleading hint in it. -- <a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4