> From: Guido van Rossum [mailto:guido@python.org] > > > Hmm ... is there a case that NotImplementedError should be a > > subclass of TypeError? Conceptually it would make sense (this *type* > > does not implement this method). > > I think you're overthinking this. NotImplementedError is fine for > code that wants to send that particular message to the user. We're > playing with TypeError here because we're trying to be close to the > metal. I'd be willing to concede that I was overthinking, except that it took surprisingly little thought for the connection to be made ;) Tim Delaney
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4