Greg Ewing <greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz>: > pinard@iro.umontreal.ca (=?iso-8859-1?q?Fran=E7ois?= Pinard): > > > Eric has offered the idea of adding Cartesian product, and despite the > > usual notation is a tall thin `X', maybe it would be nice reserving > > `*' for that? > > Maybe '%'? It looks a bit X-ish. Ugh. *No.* -1 on that, I'd look at % and see a string format operator. Suddenly I like Francois's suggestion a lot better. -- <a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4