pinard@iro.umontreal.ca (=?iso-8859-1?q?Fran=E7ois?= Pinard): > Eric has offered the idea of adding Cartesian product, and despite the > usual notation is a tall thin `X', maybe it would be nice reserving > `*' for that? Maybe '%'? It looks a bit X-ish. Or if Python ever gets a dedicated matrix-multiplication operator, maybe that could be reused. Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4