Fran=E7ois Pinard <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>: > I never saw `|' nor `&' in literature, except `|' which means "such tha= t" > in set comprehensions, as Pythoneers would be tempted to say! On the > other hand, for programmers, `|' and `&' are rather natural and easy. Now that I think of it, I've never seen a mathematician use this at all. But I agree that it's a good choice for programmersl =20 > Eric has offered the idea of adding Cartesian product, and despite the > usual notation is a tall thin `X', maybe it would be nice reserving `*' > for that?=20 Mildly in favor, but I wouldn't cry if it didn't happen. --=20 <a href=3D"http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4