> I was looking over some of the PEP's and I saw that 269 was > considered dead according to PEP 283. This is kind of odd because I was > planning to have an implementation by the end of the week. Well, but you could've told me! :-) I'll gladly revive it. > This is subject to the constraints of reality; I am taking a > whopping huge vacation starting this next weekend. It is either > going be ready for python-dev to play with this week or in the > middle of next month. Are you sure it's safe to expect your interest in this subject to extend beyond the month of August? :-) > My posts to the parser-sig are trying to be deferential to the > charter of the SIG (starting w/requirements for a general purpose parser > generator, not implementation of PEP 269). > I am certainly going to try to wrangle the parser-sig onwards, but > a pgen module is way overdue. Great! --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4